‘Leaders
are at their most vulnerable to messing
up when working in their area of greatest
ability’, said former MD of Gallup
UK, Jill Garrett.
This comment was made to me yesterday
over a coffee and appears quite apposite
in a week when British politician Clare
Short, former minister of International
Development, allegedly broke the official
Secrets’ Act. This she did when
she accused the government of bugging
Kofi Annan’s office. As I write,
allegations are flying back and forth
so there still seems to be a lot more
heat than light on the subject.
In truth, it is too early to comment
on the appropriateness of the action nor
the truthfulness of the allegation. I
accept that some will see her as a hero
and others as a traitor, however, it did
raise an interesting question for me around
Jill Garrett’s comment. Could it
be that the fantastic job that Clare Short
did in International Development, working
in her area of greatest ability by regularly
raging against injustice and oppression
has, in a more politically sensitive and
complicated area, become very much an
area of vulnerability?
As we consider the careers of some of
the charismatic and powerful leaders wrapped
up in the corporate scandals of the last
2 years, there would appear to be some
validity to Garrett’s assertion.
Numbers of those involved in those corporate
debacles were extremely talented individuals
whose charisma, power and personality
had created so much of the success that
the organisation had enjoyed. It would
appear, however, that the mix of success,
employee adulation and subsequently a
lack of in-depth accountability allowed
things to go awry. Leadership guru J A
Conger comments on this trend “Narcissistic
leaders can lose touch with reality, promote
self-serving and grandiose aims, and use
the company as a vehicle for personal
gain. A strong sense of self-importance
may blind them to diverging points of
view or to whistle blowers, leading to
poor strategic and organisational decision-making”.*
This is not only true of the top end,
but for many of us as well. Some of the
leaders I have observed over the years
built their reputations on being creators
and fixers. It transpired that a great
deal of their own sense of self-worth
and value was wrapped up in the fulfilment
of this role. It reached a point whereby
sometimes these individuals made inappropriate
strategic decisions due to their inability
to control their creative gene, and at
other times seemed to actually create
crises so that they could be seen to fix
them.
Conger comments further ‘Some of
the most dramatic and tragic outcomes
of highly narcissistic leaders are found
in their strategies and corporate visions.
Following a series of successes, these
leaders typically become convinced of
the invincibility of their ideas and intuition.
The successes reinforce the belief that
they have found ‘the formula’
– that they have special insights
into the marketplace that others do not
possess. Subordinates, bankers and the
media may reinforce these perceptions.’
*
So it appears common that at the dizzy
heights of our prowess a potential ‘altitude
blindness’ sets in. It is caused
by a heady cocktail of success, affirmation
and a strong sense of purpose, which took
us toward the goal in the first place.
Each of these work as a self-authenticating
factor on the other. Many sporting teams
find themselves most vulnerable just after
they have scored or after a significant
win. Hence it could be that Clare Short’s
successes in previous roles has blinded
her to the potentially devastating impact
of using that significant talent in an
inappropriate context. Such an incident
can only help to remind each of us that
our most vulnerable moment would appear
to be our points of greatest success.
Phil Wall
CEO
* Quotes taken from 'Danger
of Delusion', by Jay A Conger in 'Mastering
Leadership'
|